![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
gryfndor_godessI just...really don't know how to feel about tonight's episode? :/ If you just look at the plot, I liked it a lot. Portia was amazing, and James was mostly non-offensive, and their relationship really tugged at my heart.
But then you add the direction and costuming and the sexualization of Portia in EVERY POSSIBLE WAY and I just want to HULK-SMASH something. She didn't have to be wearing the collar the entire freaking episode. And if they wanted to keep it for continuity and as part of ~world-building, then they could have made it a much subtler, less look-how-I'm-owned! collar. And did they have to use the term 'master'? They couldn't have just said 'witch'?
If this were not SPN I'd almost think that the master/familiar dynamic was some sort of social commentary because the two familiars were a female POC and a gay (at least, that was how he seemed coded to me) man, both of whom are usually objectified and fetishized in the media. So if you'd had a story of familiars, I dunno, rebelling against their ~masters and overturning thepatriarchy system, it could have been an interesting metaphor. But if the writers were trying to make some sort of commentary, the Portia/James romance should have been subverted, not played as genuine and, well, sweet. So basically the writers were just being even more misogynistic and racist than usual, which is really fucking depressing. How is it STILL this bad after eight years? Why can't they learn?
So I liked the story in and of itself, but the way it was executed was just so appalling.
At least Portia was a genuinely strong and fantastic character.
And SAMMY. Oh my god, that ending, I just want to beat the writers over the head with a textbook. If they kill him or make him fail so that Dean has to save the day I will just, I don't know what I will do, but I will be VERY, VERY ANGRY. How dare they. They're taking one step forward and two steps back, having Dean acknowledge he was wrong but then showing that he might be right and poor widdle Sammy can't handle it?!?
NO. STOP IT. STOP INFANTILIZING SAM. It was okay in the early seasons when Sam was young. It's okay if Dean does it occasionally because that's realistic to sibling dynamics. At this point in time, it's not okay for the NARRATIVE to be doing it, too.
Trying to ignore that awfulness, I think I liked the rest of the Dean'n'Sam stuff? I think their conversation about trust was very true to the characters (even if the lead-up to it sucked; Dean saying that the witch spell might not work = Sam can't do anything right, really?), and I'm glad Sam was standing up for himself. Dean not trusting anyone besides himself is not the same motivation as Dean-needs-Sam-to-live that we saw in the previous episode, but even though the latter is much more sympathetic than the former, I think both thought processes are genuine (i.e., I don't think Dean was pretending anything last episode to hide his ~true motive). I think Dean really can't abide the idea of a future where he lives and Sam doesn't, and I think the fact that he doesn't trust anyone but himself only makes it easier to rationalize the idea that He Has To Be The One To Die. If Sam *can't* do it, then Dean doesn't have to worry about the selfish aspects of his Sammy Has To Live [With The Survivor's Guilt] motive. For about two seconds I really hoped that we'd actually get to see Dean finally trusting Sam and it working out, and THEN THE NOSE BLEED STARTED, AND OH LOOK I CAN'T IGNORE THE AWFULNESS, SCREW YOU WRITERS.
Meh.
Oh wait, before I get off the caps-locky portion of the evening, HOW ABOUT THOSE FLASHBACKS. At first I was like, "HOW DARE YOU MAKE THE BOYS RELIVE BEING TORTURED," and then I was like, "actually the continuity and the scenes you chose and what they say about the boys' characterization is really cool, A+ on that aspect of the episode, writers." But really, there should have been a trauma trigger warning for our poor hearts. I can't believe they showed Dean on the rack. And the fact that a comparable worst memory is his mother dying? And Sam remembering jumping into the pit and sacrificing EVERYTHING and being TORTURED for it, brb sobbing forever, BABIES.
Okay, moving on.
This is weird, but I really like that Dean doesn't like dogs (and I really like that Sam does). I am just as averse to dogs as Dean is, and I don't think I've ever seen that on TV before, given how it's basically a cardinal sin in society to Not Like Dogs. I really liked Dean and Portia's scenes together, especially given how spectacularly FANTASTIC Jensen's awkward faces were. I especially liked their ending exchange and how she joked she might even miss him, too. I really hope we see her again (I'm so relieved she didn't die; I thought she would sacrifice herself for James at the end, and then this episode would have gone straight to the bottom of the shitlist with "Heart").
So I'd say this episode definitely had some ups and downs. The good parts were Good, and the bad parts were Heinous. I've now lost probably 80% of my enthusiasm for the season arc that last week's episode gave me. What did y'all think?
But then you add the direction and costuming and the sexualization of Portia in EVERY POSSIBLE WAY and I just want to HULK-SMASH something. She didn't have to be wearing the collar the entire freaking episode. And if they wanted to keep it for continuity and as part of ~world-building, then they could have made it a much subtler, less look-how-I'm-owned! collar. And did they have to use the term 'master'? They couldn't have just said 'witch'?
If this were not SPN I'd almost think that the master/familiar dynamic was some sort of social commentary because the two familiars were a female POC and a gay (at least, that was how he seemed coded to me) man, both of whom are usually objectified and fetishized in the media. So if you'd had a story of familiars, I dunno, rebelling against their ~masters and overturning the
So I liked the story in and of itself, but the way it was executed was just so appalling.
At least Portia was a genuinely strong and fantastic character.
And SAMMY. Oh my god, that ending, I just want to beat the writers over the head with a textbook. If they kill him or make him fail so that Dean has to save the day I will just, I don't know what I will do, but I will be VERY, VERY ANGRY. How dare they. They're taking one step forward and two steps back, having Dean acknowledge he was wrong but then showing that he might be right and poor widdle Sammy can't handle it?!?
NO. STOP IT. STOP INFANTILIZING SAM. It was okay in the early seasons when Sam was young. It's okay if Dean does it occasionally because that's realistic to sibling dynamics. At this point in time, it's not okay for the NARRATIVE to be doing it, too.
Trying to ignore that awfulness, I think I liked the rest of the Dean'n'Sam stuff? I think their conversation about trust was very true to the characters (even if the lead-up to it sucked; Dean saying that the witch spell might not work = Sam can't do anything right, really?), and I'm glad Sam was standing up for himself. Dean not trusting anyone besides himself is not the same motivation as Dean-needs-Sam-to-live that we saw in the previous episode, but even though the latter is much more sympathetic than the former, I think both thought processes are genuine (i.e., I don't think Dean was pretending anything last episode to hide his ~true motive). I think Dean really can't abide the idea of a future where he lives and Sam doesn't, and I think the fact that he doesn't trust anyone but himself only makes it easier to rationalize the idea that He Has To Be The One To Die. If Sam *can't* do it, then Dean doesn't have to worry about the selfish aspects of his Sammy Has To Live [With The Survivor's Guilt] motive. For about two seconds I really hoped that we'd actually get to see Dean finally trusting Sam and it working out, and THEN THE NOSE BLEED STARTED, AND OH LOOK I CAN'T IGNORE THE AWFULNESS, SCREW YOU WRITERS.
Meh.
Oh wait, before I get off the caps-locky portion of the evening, HOW ABOUT THOSE FLASHBACKS. At first I was like, "HOW DARE YOU MAKE THE BOYS RELIVE BEING TORTURED," and then I was like, "actually the continuity and the scenes you chose and what they say about the boys' characterization is really cool, A+ on that aspect of the episode, writers." But really, there should have been a trauma trigger warning for our poor hearts. I can't believe they showed Dean on the rack. And the fact that a comparable worst memory is his mother dying? And Sam remembering jumping into the pit and sacrificing EVERYTHING and being TORTURED for it, brb sobbing forever, BABIES.
Okay, moving on.
This is weird, but I really like that Dean doesn't like dogs (and I really like that Sam does). I am just as averse to dogs as Dean is, and I don't think I've ever seen that on TV before, given how it's basically a cardinal sin in society to Not Like Dogs. I really liked Dean and Portia's scenes together, especially given how spectacularly FANTASTIC Jensen's awkward faces were. I especially liked their ending exchange and how she joked she might even miss him, too. I really hope we see her again (I'm so relieved she didn't die; I thought she would sacrifice herself for James at the end, and then this episode would have gone straight to the bottom of the shitlist with "Heart").
So I'd say this episode definitely had some ups and downs. The good parts were Good, and the bad parts were Heinous. I've now lost probably 80% of my enthusiasm for the season arc that last week's episode gave me. What did y'all think?
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2013-02-21 07:03 am (UTC)That said, fandom has had the theory for years that Dean doesn't like dogs due to getting mauled to death by hellhounds. See: 4.06 for Dean being terrified of dog. So I happily take tonight's ep as confirmation of that theory. :D
Sam, meanwhile, has had both Riot and that one dog that he adopted when he ran away to Phoenix (?), as depicted in the heaven episode in S5.
Uh, in case you were interested in ALL PREVIOUS WINCHESTER CONTACT WITH DOGS.
no subject
Date: 2013-02-21 12:25 pm (UTC)Yeah, I actually do not understand how writers, producers, and network executives could have let that air as it. It actually boggles my mind that not one gatekeeper said, "hang on a tick. This could be offensive to some people" (understatement of the year).
And it's even more annoying because I don't think the premise was inherently awful? I like exploring the non-black-and-white idea of "good" witches like James (although as you said, WHY COULDN'T HE HAVE BEEN FEMALE), and I've been wondering about familiars' place in the mythology for a few years. But they took something that could have been interesting and made it horrible in EVERY SINGLE POSSIBLE WAY.
That said, fandom has had the theory for years that Dean doesn't like dogs due to getting mauled to death by hellhounds. See: 4.06 for Dean being terrified of dog. So I happily take tonight's ep as confirmation of that theory. :D
YES YES YES. I've thought that for years (er, seasons). I've always felt sorry for Sam not being able to have a dog with Dean, but after S3 can you blame the guy for hating dogs?
no subject
Date: 2013-02-23 06:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-23 07:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-22 04:59 am (UTC)I don't even know. I'm embarrassed for this show. And embarrassed for myself, tbh.
They're taking one step forward and two steps back, having Dean acknowledge he was wrong but then showing that he might be right and poor widdle Sammy can't handle it?!?
Yeah IDK how I feel about this. This season has been so good about holding Dean accountable for his ~issues, too.
I seem to be alone in liking/sympathising with Dean ~not trusting anyone but himself. The thing is that there's a whole bag of mixed motives for him to be acting the way he's acting, and like I said, the show is being honest about that, so I'm feeling closer to him than I have in a while.
I DON'T LIKE DOGS EITHER.
no subject
Date: 2013-02-23 04:55 pm (UTC)Yeah. Whenever I tell friends about the show I feel obligated to give a disclaimer that it's really misogynistic and I watch it for the brothers' relationship and because the acting is so phenomenal. :/
I seem to be alone in liking/sympathising with Dean ~not trusting anyone but himself.
Oh I totally understand it and sympathize with it (I'd react the same way, TBH), considering how he felt abandoned by Sam in Purgatory (even if that feeling of betrayal isn't entirely rational). It makes me sad/wistful about the brothers' relationship, and I've definitely been angrier with Dean for his day-to-day behavior this season than ever before, but I still love him.
I DON'T LIKE DOGS EITHER.
no subject
Date: 2013-02-23 06:51 pm (UTC)And SAMMY. Oh my god, that ending, I just want to beat the writers over the head with a textbook. If they kill him or make him fail so that Dean has to save the day I will just, I don't know what I will do, but I will be VERY, VERY ANGRY. How dare they. They're taking one step forward and two steps back, having Dean acknowledge he was wrong but then showing that he might be right and poor widdle Sammy can't handle it?!?
NO. STOP IT. STOP INFANTILIZING SAM. It was okay in the early seasons when Sam was young. It's okay if Dean does it occasionally because that's realistic to sibling dynamics. At this point in time, it's not okay for the NARRATIVE to be doing it, too.
I don't really think that's what's going on, though? The point of the scene is that Sam interprets (IMO rightfully) Dean's offer of "trust" to be contingent on "NO visible struggle or need/desire for help or support at all" when that has never been a reasonable expectation for anything either of them has done. Sam bleeding from the nose after embarking on the trial is, like, a monster they're hunting getting in a blow at one of them. It doesn't mean whichever brother took the hit is a total wuss who lost the fight, no business hunting, GOD. If they're working together, they'll have each other's backs and walk away from it; that doesn't make the one who threw himself on the grenade weak.
That's not the narrative. That's Dean infantilizes Sam; Dean takes any and all of the hits that even the best hunters suffer and turns them into a rationalization for his attitude toward his brother. But the point of the whole season is that you can't do it alone, that expecting people to just pretend all struggle isn't there until they collapse is just setting them up to fail.
no subject
Date: 2013-02-25 02:50 am (UTC)